Great Britain
European
Prehistoric Chinese Art

 

Prehistoric Art and Artifacts

 

Introduction

Many people look at a modern sculpture and mutter "That sure ain't art." — but at least they have a personal idea of what is and is not art. But take them into an archeological museum and show them a small carved stone, and ask them if it is art or not. They would probably hesitate and finally make a decision on the basis of some feeling about the piece, or a principle learned years ago in school which might be applicable to the question. This is a problem for most people when viewing prehistoric art. On the other hand, they can look at cave paintings and go into raptures about how beautiful it is.

Another problem is how to speak about time periods that are immense, beyond our normal conceptions of time. We have a good grasp of a century, and some feel for a millennium. It has been two millennia since Christ. Two millennia is 20 centuries. When one talks about the history of man or when man started to create art, the numbers in years get too big to be comprehensible. This museum uses the convention of expressing things that happened before Christ in number of centuries before Christ. So 40c, is 4,000 BC. That is, 40c is about 6,000 years ago.

 

 

What is art?

Art is symbolic communication practiced by humans. But this definition is too broad since that would include all language. And intuitively one senses that not all language is art. But if we want to talk about art, especially primitive art, we need to defined it somehow. So let's assume that in addition to being symbolic communication, to be art must provide communication beyond the ordinary level of discourse and use. This means that a laundry list, or accounting records are not art even if they find themselves in a museum display. But a novel or a wall painting probably is. The visual arts then excludes music (an auditory art), novels (a literary art), and dancing (a performance art).

This definition excludes the purely decorative, that is art must attempt to communicate something beyond itself. Thus the decorative arts and furniture may be art, but they may also be just an artifact. Artifacts are objects or images made by man; that is, they are non-natural objects. A jar or a sculpture is an artifact; a mountain or a stone is a natural object. All objects of art are artifacts, but only some artifacts are art.

Communication is something that requires a source and destination. A coffin from ancient Egypt may be a work of art if one feels that the decorations were made by the artist (the source) to communicate something to the owner (before death) or to his relatives or other living people (after death). But likewise one can also view it from the owner's perspective and say the decorations were a communication from him to the gods. The artist in that case is just an intermediary craftsman carrying out the wishes of the owner. Then in all these cases, the artifact that is the coffin would be art, otherwise it is just an artifact of the civilization... rare, expensive, maybe even unique, but not a work of art. Decorated plates and pots for example are often artifacts and not art, but there is not reason a plate might not be constructed or decorated to communicate something to its owner or from its owner to another person who might use it.

 

 

How Old is Homo Sapiens?

The current educated guess by anthropologists, who extrapolating backwards from the old fossil remains of early man, put the origins of man between 2,500c and 2,000c in the rift valley of South-Eastern Africa. It is not known if hominids (man like species) developed in more than one place, or if everyone is descended from a single pair of African ancestors. Separate development is called the multi-regional theory of human origins. The alternative is the out-of-Africa model, in which the hominids from Africa spread out and settled the rest of the world. There is a compromise idea which assumes that the hominids from Africa spread throughout the world, met, mated with and conquered or assimilated local native hominids. Most scientists today believe the Out-of-Africa hypothesis.

 

Evidence of Art?

Australians like to claim that Australian art of the aboriginal peoples date from very early times, around 500c BC. The first art objects in Europe date from around 300c BC. European cave painting started around 220c and continued until about 100c. That is a long period of time, the cave painting period in Europe lasted 55 times as long as the period of time since Christ and stopped happening 10,000 years before Christ. Prehistoric man painted in caves in Africa, Euro-Asia, Europe, and Australia. In Australia aboriginal descendents are still making cave pictures.

In more recent times, Mayan Indians in Mesoamerica were active cave painters, and the American Indians also did cave paintings.

In the 1950s Russian academics discovered the remains of graves dating back to 280c BC. In them a 60 year old man, a 10 year old girl, and a 12 year old boy were found. They were all decorated with beads, each in a different way. The girl had snow-flake like carvings around her head and torso, the boy had a belt made of fox canine teeth, and the man wore a pendant made of stone in the middle of his chest. So as early as 300c before Christ people were decorating themselves, making distinctions in sex, age, and social position.

About this same time in pre-history, about 300c BC, archeologists have found many miniature sculptures of big-breasted, broad-hipped women. These have been called Venus figurines.

 

annon: [sculpture] prehistoric willendorf venus

 

To put this all in perspective, the current commonly accepted theory is that earliest man developed in Africa and over long periods of time migratory waves of humans swept through the Middle East and Central Asia which populated the rest of the world. It's really not right to call this "migration", because each wave took many generations. If humanoids existed in a site from an earlier wave, or because they had developed independently, then they were conquered or assimilated by our ancestors. The times on the chart below don't look likely, but they record the approximate dates of the earliest artifacts found in particular regions. With more research, perhaps the patterns of "migration" of early man will become more clear. All dates are given in centuries BC.

 

 

 

Out of Africa

The Expansion of Man

 

 

 

Early Human Artifacts from Around the World

Russia

Female Figurine
(Venus Figure)
23000-21000 BC
from Kostenky Settlement
limestone; h 10 cm
Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia

Swan in Flight
about 21000-20000 BC
Malta Settlement
mammoth ivory; h 10 cm
Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia

Vessel Decorated with
Animals and a “Landscape”

about 2500 BC
from North Caucasus,
Maikop Burial Mound
silver; h 10 cm

Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia

 

Figure of a Bull
about 2500 BC
from North Caucasus,
Maikop Burial Mound
gold; h 6 cm

Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia

 

 

Head of a Elk Doe
about 2000 BC
from Shigir peat bog,
Sverdlovsk Region, the Urals
elk horn; len 20 cm
Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia

Neolithic Idol
about 1700 BC
Usvyaty IV Settlement, Pskov Region
elk horn; h 9 cm
Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia

Turkey

Horned Animal
about 2300 BC
bronze, h 9 cm
from NW Anatolia
Museum of Fine Art
Boston, MA, US

Gold Jug
about 2300-2100 BC
gold; h 18 cm
from Alaca Huyuk, Turkey
Archaelogical Museum
Ankara, Turkey

Elam

[Modern Iraq; pre Persian]

Animal Abstractions
on a Beaker

about 3000 BC
from Susa Iran
dried clay; 20 cm

Animal Abstractions
on a Beaker

about 3000 BC
from Susa Iran
dried clay; 23.5 cm
Hermitage
St Petersburg, Russia

China

(several more pictures available)

Clay Woman Figurine
about 3500 BC

Dawenkou:
Jade Pei Pectoral

2500 BC

Europe

(several more pictures available)

Cave Painting, Chauvet

Cave Painting, Lascaux

Great Britain

(several more pictures
available)

Stonehenge — Air View

Stonehenge — Sarsen Circle

 

 

Great Britain
European
Prehistoric Chinese Art

2005-10-14